Selection # 11 – An Inconvenient Truth – Part Seven

This selected entry was originally published here on July 16, 2017

So where has this search for the truth about global warming and climate change led us? What started off as an investigation into the science of what was going on in the upper atmosphere of our planet, has taken us on a circuitous journey to secret bases deep below the surface of the earth.

And what began as an innocent enough enquiry into a phenomenon that has captured the attention of all the countries around the globe, has led us into a dark world of government secrecy and classified information that is shrouded in deception, disease and death.

This quest for understanding has taken us from international forums where the subject is widely discussed and openly debated, to hidden chambers where evidence is officially denied as a conspiratorial hoax, and whistleblowers who speak out do so at the risk of their lives.

Yet beneath all this talk of conspiracy and denial, one truth remains self evident. The facts speak for themselves, no matter how much political spin is applied. The threat is real, and the threat is now. The evidence is undeniable, and it keeps on mounting month by month.

Our climate is changing, and changing at a pace that is beyond the control of any government, whether national or international. Extreme weather events are occurring all around the planet, threatening the existence of every species, from fish and birds to human beings themselves.

The Apparent Truth

Faced with this threat, the scientists of the world have come together to try to speak with a single voice on this matter. According to the official NASA website on Global Climate Change there is a consensus among studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

According to NASA, the conclusion of 97% of climate scientists who have actively published reports on this subject is that climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely to have been the result of human activity, which is what activists like Al Gore have been preaching for years.

The human activities they refer to are the burning of coal and gas to generate power, as well and the use of carbon-based products to fuel our cars and machinery. It is the burning of these products that create the greenhouse gases that form the atmospheric barrier that traps heat.

And because global warming is believed to be a problem that we ourselves have caused, there has been a growing movement within the international community that has culminated in the Paris Accord on climate change, in which 195 countries have agreed to reduce their use of carbon products.

But behind this apparent unanimity among scientists and nations that human beings are the cause of climate change, and are therefore directly responsible for solving the problem, there has been another sinister and secret campaign that is based on a totally different premise.

The Real Truth

That premise, which is also supported by scientific study, holds that changes in the climate of our planet, as well as the increasing heat on land and in the ocean, are the direct result of energies that are impacting the earth from sources beyond the solar system.

And based on this premise, secret agencies around the world have joined together to embark on a two-fold campaign. One part is designed to create an atmospheric shield around the planet to protect it from incoming radiation, and the other is to build underground and undersea shelters to save a select few from destruction.

The rationale behind the extreme secrecy surrounding this campaign is simple. If the truth about global warming is that the lives of all the people on the planet are at risk, then that truth can never be made public. As the whistleblower known as “Deep Shield” explained:

“Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to maintain public calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying. Humanity is on the road to extinction – without the Shield mankind will die off within 20 to 50 years.

“Most people alive today could live to see this extinction take place. This means that an announcement of the situation we face boils down to telling every man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are going to be killed.

“People would panic. There would be economic collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse. Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would reduce civilian centers to rubble within days.

“Half of the population in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities seeking ‘safety’ in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe.

“Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors, fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the chances of survival are small”. (View Source)

Increasing Cosmic Radiation

So what is the real cause of this threat? The honest answer is that we still do not know. All we can say is that the earth, as well as the entire solar system, is being subjected to significantly increasing amounts of cosmic radiation, as can be seen in the following graph taken from Spaceweather.com 

As the above graph clearly indicates, in the short space of two years from March 2015 to May 2017, the amount of cosmic radiation registered by high altitude balloons in the upper atmosphere above California has increased by 13%. The website goes on to say:

“Why are cosmic rays intensifying? The main reason is the sun. Solar storm clouds such as coronal mass ejections (CMEs) sweep aside cosmic rays when they pass by Earth. During Solar Maximum, CMEs are abundant and cosmic rays are held at bay.

“Now, however, the solar cycle is swinging toward Solar Minimum, allowing cosmic rays to return. Another reason could be the weakening of the Earth’s magnetic field, which helps protect us from deep-space radiation”.

As pointed out above, the main reason that cosmic rays are intensifying is the sun. This was also pointed out by Swiss and German scientists as far back as July 2004, according to a report that was published in the British newspaper The Telegraph.

This study was based on research led by Dr. Sami Solanki, director of the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany. The conclusion of their study was that the earth was getting hotter because the sun was brighter than at any time in the last 1,000 years.

Although Dr. Solanki indicated that he did not know what was causing the sun to burn brighter, or how long this cycle would last, he did say that he believed that the impact of this intense sunlight on the ozone layer could be affecting the climate more than the sunlight itself.

Ozone Layer

Dr. Solanki’s comment about the effect of this intense sunlight upon the ozone layer goes to the very heart of the problem that is affecting the earth at this time. The reason is because of the nature of the ozone layer, and the function it fulfills in our atmosphere.

The atmosphere of the earth is divided into several layers. The lowest layer, called the troposphere, extends from the surface of the earth to about six miles (10 kms) in altitude. The next layer, called the stratosphere, extends from there up to about thirty miles (50 kms) above the earth.

The ozone layer consists of ozone molecules that are suspended in the upper reaches of the stratosphere. Stratospheric ozone is a naturally occurring gas that helps to filter out ultraviolet (UV) radiation emanating from the sun. It has been called the earth’s sunscreen.

So if the ozone layer is diminished for any reason, as it is now, it allows more UV radiation to reach the earth’s surface. And it is this increased UV radiation that leads to skin cancer, cataracts and other health problems. It also disrupts marine life and reduces crop yields.

But ordinary people do not need scientific studies to tell them that something is seriously wrong with our sun. They can see and sense this as they go about their daily duties. They already know that sunlight feels hotter and that it is easier to get sunburned than before.

One of the easiest ways to find out what ordinary citizens think about the sun, is to scan the comments that can be seen below YouTube videos dealing with the subject of climate change. The following is a selection of what people around the world have been saying recently.

What YouTube Viewers Have to Say

“The Sun burns like the arc from a welder machine. Prickly hot on the skin. When you go outside it’s like living in an overexposed photograph is the only way I can explain it.

“We live in Camp Verde AZ – every year up to this year we have had an increasing number of fire ants in our yard. This year we have not seen even ONE ANT anywhere in the whole yard. Looking for them, we can’t find any. How can ants just not be there anymore? Are they all hiding under ground because of the deadly UV spikes? Are they all dead?

“All I know is that the UV intensity and whiteness of the sun is relatively new,  and the climate, the weather, the air quality and other things were completely different when I was a kid, and I’ve lived in the same part of the country for more than sixty years. The changes are undeniable and I do not think it has all been caused by burning fossil fuels.

“I am 48 and I can say for a FACT!! I remember the sun being softer gold with yellow tones. You could look at it for a second. This bright white sun you can’t even glimpse at is not the sun I remember as a kid.

“I’m 43. You are right on about the Sun being white. It’s been like that a few years now. I been photographing the Sun for awhile now. Pictures show a white Sun.

“I’ve been telling my friends & family for at least 5-8 years now – our sunlight seems different. It feels different on my skin. I try to explain to them that it’s subtle, but it’s certainly different.

“When I’m out in the sun, the light hurts my skin in a different way than it ever has in my entire life — I’m now 45. I explain it as though it “feels hotter” — which is a poor description, I know. But it stings in a way that it never has before — a bit more intense, I suppose. It’s so very difficult to articulate… It just feels like the sunlight is more “intense”.

“What makes me say that is the effect that it has on my sensory nerves under my skin. Of course, most people say that I’m nuttier than usual, but I certainly can & I stand by my own claims that the sunlight is different than it’s been during the first 35-38 years of my life.

“I’m from Warren county in SW Ohio. I currently live in Dayton. For the past few years I have definitely felt the sun burning my skin faster than my entire life and it seems to only be getting worse. Crazy weather we’ve been having here in Ohio.

“Something must be up. I just got mild sunburn after 30 minutes outdoors yesterday. This is Winter (Tasmania, Australia). A passer by commented to me that the Sun was too bright, too hot, and much bigger for Winter…and it was not as low on the horizon.

“Notice how the sun doesn’t have a yellow hue any more, bright white!!

“No offense sincerely, but I remember a yellow hued sun growing up. I loved to watch clouds and the sun felt warm – not burning little water blisters on my forearms. Something has affected our star.

“94º today in PA. Something definitely has been going on with the sun for years now. It doesn’t seem so hot out until you get into sunlight. Then it feels like you are being micro-waved. Strange.

“I’m sensitive to the sun. It’s definitely hotter and more intense. I can’t even go out for a minute now without getting really red.

“My dear grandson got a terrible burn today here in Maryland, even though he was covered in sun-block.

“Yes, for we who knew the benign golden Sun, it’s really sad. I can hardly see to drive when the road glares so much under this light. Maybe I need welder’s goggles, it seems to burn and leave after images. You see everybody squinting some days.

“The sun was yellow and sky blue. It was called the golden sun. Remember the children’s  song: Mister sun, Mister sun, Mister golden sun, please shine down on me. The sky was also much bluer then.

“Another older guy to testify that the sun used to be yellow. It was possible to look directly at the sun for up to about ten seconds and this was intense but felt purifying. Now the sun’s so bright you’d go blind.

“Adding to an old post. Yes, I’m 57. The sun used to be yellow. As a young (and dumb) kid I used to stare into the sun to see how long I could look at it. It was yellow. The sun used to rise and set in yellow, orange, & red with the red being the color when it was closest to the horizon. Today, it is simply white and almost unbearable to the eyes.

“I think what happened is the ozone just left us, I remember it being yellow. We as kids during the 80s colored in a “Yellow sun” I noticed this shift in 2002 / 2004. Suddenly it was just this crazy white and it gets whiter every year.

The above comments made by ordinary people may seem rambling and mundane, but they go to the essence of the changes that are taking place on the sun. In fact they have unwittingly realised the true cause of global warming and the effect this is having upon the surface of the earth.

The key to understanding global warming is simply this. The earth is getting hotter because the sun is getting hotter. And the hotter the sun gets, the whiter it gets.

The changes that these viewers have described have so far eluded all those climatologists who subscribe to the greenhouse gases explanation of global warming. The truth is that climate change is not the result of people burning fossil fuels. It is because the sun itself has changed.

The Conventional Theory of the Sun

Conventional climatologists suffer from one basic defect which prevents them from understanding the true causes of the changes that are taking place on this planet, and that is their understanding (or should I say “misunderstanding”) of the nature and function of our sun.

All the leading colleges and universities around the world teach a single theory about the origin and nature of the sun, and any student who hopes to graduate and go on to enjoy a career in science is obliged to accept this theory as proven fact.

The conventional view of science is that our sun is a circular star which lies at the centre of our solar system. This star is considered to be roughly 865,000 miles (1,393,000 kilometres) in diameter, with a mass of about 330,000 times the mass of the earth.

As a result of spectrographic analysis, three-quarters of this mass has been found to consist of hydrogen, while the rest of it is made up mostly of helium. Small amounts of heavier elements such as oxygen, carbon, neon and iron have also been found.

Our sun is thought to have formed about four and a half billion years ago, and is considered to have been the result of the gravitational collapse of a large molecular cloud, and it is this cloud that ultimately became the sun with its orbiting planets.

Being at the centre of this gravitational collapse, our sun became increasingly hot and dense until it reached a point when thermonuclear fusion spontaneously occurred. It is this process of nuclear fusion, by converting hydrogen nuclei into helium, that produces its heat and light.

Charles Bruce

All remained well in this neatly organized world of accepted theory until a Scottish astrophysicist by the name of Charles Bruce arrived on the scene. In 1944, Bruce, who was an electrical researcher, astronomer, and expert on the effects of lightning, made an unusual discovery.

He found that the surface of the sun had the same appearance, temperature and spectral analysis as an electric arc. He then went on to make a bold proposition. The sun looked like an electric arc, he said, and had the same characteristics as an electrical arc, because it was an electric arc.

So what Charles Bruce theorised was that the sun was not a nuclear furnace after all. It was in fact an electrical body made up of a large number of arcs in parallel with one another. He explained that our sun, as well as every other star, was actually a sophisticated, though complex, electric light bulb.

Bruce’s idea that the source of the sun’s heat and light was the result of electromagnetic rather than thermonuclear interactions, was laughed at by all the scientific authorities of his time, just as it continues to be rejected to this day.

There was, however, one small problem, and that was that the old theory was devised by scientists before the advent of the space age. And once it became possible to send scientific probes into space to study the properties of the sun, it was clear that the accepted theory of the sun was in trouble.

The problem was that this elegant mathematical theory that had been held so fervently by so many people for so many years, was just not supported by the facts. The evidence proved that every aspect of the existing theory was wrong. In fact, it was so obvious that even a child could see it.

Ralph Juergens

The deficiencies of the traditional theory were exposed some years later when an American civil engineer named Ralph Juergens wrote an article in which he demolished the long accepted theory of the sun. In an unequivocal assessment of the situation, Juergens wrote:

“I can find no way to state this diplomatically, so let me be blunt. The modern astrophysical concept that ascribes the Sun’s energy to thermonuclear reactions deep in the solar interior is contradicted by nearly every observable aspect of the Sun.”

What incensed Juergens at the time was not only that the accepted theory of the sun as a thermonuclear reactor was unable to explain the observed features of the sun, but that the scientists who held so firmly to this theory blithely ignored these features.

The fundamental problem with the existing theory was this. If the sun truly was a nuclear reactor, converting hydrogen atoms into helium through a process of thermonuclear fusion, then there should be a simple temperature gradient between the inner and outer heat of the sun.

In other words, the sun should be hottest at its centre. And the further away one went from the surface of the sun, the cooler it should become. The problem was that the actual temperature readings on which all astrophysicists agreed showed the exact opposite.

The temperature at the surface of the sun is roughly 4,400 degrees Kelvin (7,460ºF). But about four times further away, it rises steadily to about 20,000ºK (35,540ºF) . From there the temperature jumps abruptly to two million degrees Kelvin (3,554,000ºF) in the Corona.

Based on this new data provided by space probes which was the opposite of what the traditional theory predicted, Juergens not only exposed the shortcomings of existing theory, but he went on to propose an entirely new theory of the sun that was founded on electromagnetism.

According to Juergens, the source of the energy that powers the sun comes from space beyond the sun, and this energy is electrical in nature. The sun is therefore the focus of a “coronal glow discharge” that is fed by electric currents coursing throughout the galaxy.

As he wrote in 1972, some years before his death in 1979, in an article entitled Reconciling Celestial Mechanics and Velikovskian Catastrophism:

“The known characteristics of the interplanetary medium suggest not only that the sun and the  planets are electrically charged, but that the sun itself is the focus of a cosmic electric discharge – the probable source of all its radiant energy“. (See Electric Sun)

As he went on to clarify, “The sun is electrically powered – the source of the sun’s energy is coming from electric currents in galactic space.”  (See Electric Comet)

Today, Juergen’s ideas have been amplified and refined by a growing body of scientists who have aligned themselves with the Thunderbolts Group. They believe that we live in an “Electric Universe”, and that electromagnetism is the fundamental source of all created life.

The Electric Sun

What ordinary people have now come to realise is that our sun has changed. It has become hotter and it has become “whiter”. And as the evidence quoted earlier shows, the earth is being impacted by ever increasing amounts of harmful UV radiation emanating from the sun.

Nevertheless, the key contribution that Juergens has made to this discussion is the idea that the sun is electrically powered, that the brightness of the sun is dependent upon its “coronal glow discharge”, and that this in turn is fed by electric currents coursing throughout the galaxy.

So the reason why the sun now appears hotter and “whiter” is because the area through which the solar system is now travelling is being exposed to more intense radiation, which has changed the sun’s electromagnetic field, and therefore its “coronal glow discharge”.

And as Charles Bruce noted earlier, just like an arc welder’s torch changes colour with the intensity of the current and glows “whiter” as it gets hotter, so changes to the “coronal glow discharge” of the sun are causing it to feel hotter and look “whiter” when we experience it on the earth.

So what common people everywhere are reporting is evidence that these changes to the sun are having devastating effects upon the earth, as evidence mounts of more and more species being harmed by the increasing levels of lethal UVB and UVC radiation.

The “inconvenient” truth about climate change is that the earth is dying. It is losing its ability to support life. Insects are dying. Trees and plants are dying. Birds and animals are dying. How long before our agriculture and crop yields are seriously affected? How much time do we ourselves have left?

This truth is inescapable. It is no longer something that we can merely shrug off as inconsequential. Not only is it a truth that none of us can avoid, but it is one that every one of us must come to terms with as we make the day-to-day decisions about the future conduct of our lives. 

Unfortunately, the reality is that very few people today are equipped to handle the devastating truth that the world as we know it is coming to an end. They simply cannot bring themselves to believe that the entire human species could be threatened with extinction.

Yet the evidence is there for all to see. And it is growing more and more evident with every passing year. We are reminded of the movie A Few Good Men, in which the actor Jack Nicholson uttered that memorable line, “You can’t handle the truth!”.  

The ultimate question is: Can you?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 15th, 2017 at 10:58 am and is filed under Selections. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Comments and pings are closed.